The IRS recently released highly anticipated regulations addressing the deduction of up to 20% of qualified business income (QBI) from pass-through entities — a deduction also known as the pass-through deduction, the QBI deduction or the Section 199A deduction. The deduction was a major component of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which became law late last year.
The proposed regulations, while not yet final, have answered some of the key questions taxpayers have been asking, such as what specifically qualifies as a specified service trade or business (SSTB) and guidance on combination techniques to maximize the deduction. The regulations also provide a lot of definitional clarity, guidance on the computational mechanics and sent off a warning shot pertaining to people considering changing status from an employee to a contractor as well as people considering the use of multiple trusts to work around certain income limitations.
When an individual owns interests in several qualifying non-SSTB businesses, the individual can potentially choose to aggregate the entities and treat them as a single business for purposes of:
Generally businesses must have common ownership, the same fiscal year and not be in a specified service trade or business as discussed below. However, there is an added test of meeting two of the three following criteria:
Aggregating businesses can allow an individual with higher taxable income to claim a larger QBI deduction when the limitations based on W-2 wages and the UBIA of qualified property would otherwise reduce or eliminate the allowable deduction.
For example, if a high-income individual owns an interest in one business with high QBI but little or no W-2 wages and an interest in another business with minimal QBI but significant W-2 wages, aggregating the two could result in a healthy QBI deduction. Keeping them separate could result in a lower deduction or maybe no deduction at all.
The proposed regulations define specified SSTBs. The status as an SSTB is important, because QBI deductions based on SSTB income begin to be phased out after an individual’s taxable income (calculated before any QBI deduction) exceeds $157,500 ($315,000 for a married joint filer).
The proposed regulations also include anti-abuse rules intended to prevent service business owners from separating out parts of what otherwise would be an integrated SSTB — such as an optometrist practice’s sales of vision care items, or the rental of the law firm's building from an entity owned by the same partners in an attempt to qualify the separated part for the QBI deduction.
In general, an SSTB is a trade or business that performs services in one or more of the following fields:
In addition, an SSTB can be any trade or business where the principal asset is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners.
What’s a trade or business where the principal asset is the reputation or skill of an owner or employee? Good question. Before the proposed regulations were released, there was concern that this SSTB definition could snare unsuspecting businesses, such as a restaurant with a well-regarded chef.
Thankfully, the proposed regulations limit this definition to trades or businesses that meet one or more of the following descriptions:
View our chart detailing how the regulations categorize various service businesses for purposes of the deduction.
Overall, the proposed QBI deduction regulations are lengthy and complex. This article only scratches the surface of the proposed rules. Work closely with your tax advisors to sort through the details to get the best QBI deduction results in your specific circumstances.
Click here for a simplified chart on how to calculate the deduction.
Please contact a member of your service team, or contact Mike Kolk at mkolk@cohencpa.com for further discussion.
Cohen & Company is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. Information contained in this post is considered accurate as of the date of publishing. Any action taken based on information in this blog should be taken only after a detailed review of the specific facts, circumstances and current law.